Skip to main content

Delhi Government To File Status Report On Formulation Of SOP For DNA Testing For Identification Of Bodies: Delhi High Court

Delhi Government To File Status Report On Formulation Of SOP For DNA Testing For Identification Of Bodies: Delhi High Court

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court on Friday asked the city government to file a status report on the issue of formulation of a standard operating procedure (SOP) for DNA testing to carry out the identification of bodies.

Hon'ble Justice Prathiba M Singh, while dealing with a plea filed in the aftermath of the riots of February 2020 in Delhi, noted that the Hon'ble High Court has earlier said that such procedures ought to be prepared but the issue was stated to have remained unresolved.

Also Read: Attendance Of A Minimum Percentage Of Classes Prescribed In Professional Courses Such As LL.B. Is Non-Negotiable, Reiterates Delhi HC

The court's order was passed while dealing with a petition filed in March 2020 by a man who sought directions from the authorities to expeditiously conclude the process of DNA matching to find out if one of the recovered bodies was that of his brother who went missing amidst the violence in North-East Delhi.

"Examine it and come back," the court told the counsel for the Delhi government.

The court also permitted the counsel for the petitioner to give his suggestions which may be considered by the Delhi government if the SOP is yet to be framed.  

Also Read: Trained Judicial Officers Ignorant Of Procedure To Be Adopted In A Case Involving Offences Under The UAP Act: Madras HC, Directs Tamil Nadu State Judicial Academy To Conduct A Refresher Course For The Judicial Officers 

The counsel for the petitioner said that after a direction was passed for urgent DNA testing in the present case, it was found that the body in question was that of the petitioner's brother.  

The petitioner had earlier told the court that his brother went missing from home on February 25, 2020, and in the backdrop of the riots, violence, and arson that was ongoing at that time in the North-East part of Delhi, he feared that his brother might have met an unfortunate end.

Also Read: Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking use of red ant chutney for preventing Covid-19 infection

Subsequently, it was learnt that a body was found in the area and the blood of the petitioner's father was collected at GTB Hospital with the purpose of conducting DNA matching but no expeditious action was taken after that.

While directing that the DNA matching of the body be undertaken on an urgent basis, the high court had, on March 19, 2020, said there should be an SOP so that such essential matters are dealt with in a timely and even-handed manner, without leaving the affected parties to the discretion, whims, and fancies of the authorities.

The matter would be heard next on May 12.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Lawgic Simplified staff and is posted from a syndicated feed.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

  In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another.  Also Read:  Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.”   The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...