Attendance Of A Minimum Percentage Of Classes Prescribed In Professional Courses Such As LL.B. Is Non-Negotiable, Reiterates Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on Monday refused to permit a law student to appear for his semester examinations after he was detained by Delhi University for low attendance, and observed that classrooms are where students get trained for profession. Justice Sanjeev Narula issued notice on the law student's plea against his detention to DU and granted time to file its stand, but rejected his application seeking a stay on the detention order.

While the student's father urged the court to grant interim relief to his son at this stage, the judge questioned as to why he was "standing up" for his son who attended less than 50 per cent of his classes and remarked that it would be a lesson for life. "The classes are where you get trained. Have you questioned your son why is he not attending classes? Why are you standing up for him?... Nobody is questioning his intelligence.

Also Read - Clear and specific legal framework needed for cases involving 'sex on false promise of marriage': Allahabad High Court

As a father you are hurt that he is losing six months but have you questioned him? He is attending 50 per cent of classes," the court said. "He is a grown up child. He is not even a child. He is 24 (years of age). That is when you face the world. Let him understand that this will be a lesson for life. This is just entry into the professional world," stated the court.

The petitioner student, who secured about 47 per cent attendance, claimed that he was asked to be on bed rest due to a fracture on his right hand in November and therefore could not attend classes due to reasons beyond his control. The petitioner challenged the detention order on several grounds including that it did not provide the reasons for the same.

Also Read - Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

The court noted that even if the period for which the petitioner was allegedly advised to take bed rest is taken into consideration, he would still fall short of the minimum requirement of 70 per cent attendance and the latitude of 30 per cent is given for circumstances like sickness, etc. Counsel for DU stated that as per the applicable rules, every student has to secure at least 70 per cent classes and even if benefit is given to the petitioner for the duration of "bed rest", his attendance would only climb up to 59 per cent.

CLICK HERE TO READ ORDER

(Except for the headline,this story has not been edited by Lawgic Simplified staff and is posted from a syndicated feed.)

Comments

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another. Also Read: Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.” The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...

Lawgic Simplified

Search This Blog