Skip to main content

Delay in submitting the forensic test report due to the lack of adequate manpower poses a significant challenge to the administration of justice: Orissa High Court

Delay in submitting the forensic test report due to the lack of adequate manpower poses a significant challenge to the administration of justice: Orissa High Court

By - Pavni Dada*

The field of forensic science is hampered by manpower shortages. Due to this, as well as the large number of pending cases, experts frequently fail to complete the testing within the time frame set forth in the testing protocol. The High Court of Orissa took note of the fact that most of the forensic laboratories are understaffed and lack basic infrastructure. 

It was brought to the notice of the court that 579 cases pertaining to DNA tests are pending with the State Forensic Science Laboratory (“SFSL”), Bhubaneswar which is manned by only two Scientific Officers and two Assistant Scientific Officers. Though proposals to increase the strength have been given to the government, no steps have been taken by the government in this regard.  

Also Read - Admissions conducted through private counselling are per se illegal: Supreme Court dismisses plea of students admitted through private counselling

“It is unfortunate that the State Government has not given priority to the issue as it deserves”, the bench observed. According to the bench, in order to decongest the caseloads of the SFSL, Bhubaneswar, the topic of strengthening Regional Forensic Laboratories spread throughout the state, demands special attention.

The bench observed that such a delay in completing tests and providing scientific reports is an affront to the criminal justice system and contributes to the system’s inefficiencies. The Court was informed by the SFSL's director that there were concerns with the shortage of manpower. It was argued that the Laboratory failed to perform testing as required under the testing methodology as a result of such a shortage. 

Also Read - An educated person is not immune to cheating: Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail to a senior Navy officer accused of rape

The bench also referred the reports of various committees and commissions set up by the Government of India such as report of the National Police Commission; the Report of the Ribeiro Committee; the Padmanabhaiah Committee Report and the Report of the Soli Sorabjee Committee. All of them have emphasized the importance of forensic science as a potent tool in the arsenal of justice administration. 

“...this Court requests the Chief Secretary and Home Secretary, Government of Odisha to look into the pending issue of inadequate manpower of the S.F.S.L., Bhubaneswar and other regional centres with utmost urgency and to take stringent measures to ensure that these tests...are done within the time prescribed under the protocol so that the Courts, the prosecutors, and litigants in general would not have to wait for the scientific reports for months together.”, the order said.

CLICK HERE TO READ ORDER.

*Pavni Dada is a 1st year student pursuing B.B.A.LL.B from Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another.  Also Read:  Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

  In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Application by a Necessary Party Seeking Recall of an Ex-Parte Order is Maintainable: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court ruled that every Court and Tribunal possess inherent power to set aside an ex-parte order as a form of 'procedural review,' distinct from the statutory power to review a case on merits. Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava held that revenue authorities can recall an ex-parte order to correct procedural defects and ensure justice between the parties. This inherent power allows the Court or Tribunal to correct procedural illegality that invalidates the proceedings and the order itself.  The case in question involved a recall application against an ex-parte order passed under Section 24 of the UP Revenue Code. The Court held that a recall application can be maintained by non-parties if they are necessary parties to the proceedings.  The judgment emphasizes the principle of natural justice that no adverse orders should be passed without giving an opportunity of hearing, and a recall can be sought to correct procedural errors.  The Court clarif...