Skip to main content

Admissions conducted through private counselling are per se illegal: Supreme Court dismisses plea of students admitted through private counselling

Admissions conducted through private counselling are per se illegal: Supreme Court dismisses plea of students admitted through private counselling

By -
Divisha Srivastava*

While dismissing the review petitions filed by some medical students, the Supreme Court observed that no sympathy can be offered to those who entered by the backdoor.

Some medical students had filed a petition before the Supreme Court, contesting the Medical Council of India’s discharge letter directing discharge of 67 students admitted to the Glocal Medical College. They stated that they were admitted through the Glocal Medical College’s counselling process and that they had passed the first and second-year examinations.

Also Read - An educated person is not immune to cheating: Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail to a senior Navy officer accused of rape

In response to their petition, the MCI and the State of Uttar Pradesh claimed that they were admitted through backdoor and that their admission was a consequence of collaboration between the Glocal Medical College and them.

The court noted that the state of Uttar Pradesh has issued a notification mandating centralised counselling for all institutions in the state for admission to MBBS/BDS courses based on NEET 2016. Though minority schools were permitted to admit students from their community based on Centralized Counseling conducted by the State on the basis of NEET 2016, the court noted that this had to be done without compromising the students’ merit.

Also Read - Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

The court stated that the announcement published by the state of Uttar Pradesh made it clear that admissions would only be made through a centralised admission procedure. “It was not at all permissible for the  Glocal   Medical   College to have conducted private counselling. The admissions which were conducted through the said private counselling cannot be termed as anything else but per se illegal”, the bench observed.

The bench comprising Justices L. Nageswara Rao, B.R. Gavai, and Krishna Murari dismissed the review petitions observing that “Glocal Medical College in contravention of the said Notification conducted private counselling, which was not at all permissible in law. The students cannot be said to be ignorant about the Notification issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh...In such a situation, no sympathies can be shown to such students who have entered through backdoor”. 

CLICK HERE TO READ JUDGMENT.

*Divisha Srivastava is a 1st year student pursuing B.B.A.LL.B from S.N.D.T School of Law, Mumbai, Maharashtra.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

  In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another.  Also Read:  Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.”   The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...