Skip to main content

Detention of Manipur activist under NSA: Supreme Court grants two weeks to Manipur government to file response to compensation plea

Detention of Manipur activist under NSA: Supreme Court grants two weeks to Manipur government to file response to compensation plea

Today the Supreme Court granted the Manipur government two weeks to file its response to a plea seeking compensation to political activist Leichombam Erendro, who was released yesterday from detention under the National Security Act for having criticised BJP leaders on use of cow dung and urine as cures for COVID-19. 

A bench comprising Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah on Monday had directed the Manipur government to release Erendro, stating that he cannot be kept in prison even for a night.


The Supreme Court issued notice to the Manipur government saying that this was a serious matter as someone lost his liberty for over two months and the petitioners have prayed for grant of compensation to Erendro for detention. The bench noted Solicitor General’s submission that Erendro was released on Monday evening following the Supreme Court’s direction to Imphal jail authorities and charges against him under NSA and the detention were revoked.   

It was contended on behalf of the petitioner that the plea filed by the petitioner (Erendro’s father) prayed for two reliefs. First, to quash the detention order passed by the District Magistrate of Imphal West District against Erendro on May 17  and, secondly, compensation for his detention.


Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the state will have to satisfy the detention order on merits and the same could have been avoided by a little pragmatic approach.


CLICK HERE TO READ ORDER.
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownJuly 20, 2021 at 11:31 PM

    Well done Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Court is the custodian of Constitution of India. That means, the Court will protect the freedom, liberty and privacy of citizens of India, and will compensate and give relief in case of violation of their rights.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

  In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another.  Also Read:  Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.”   The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...
Post a Comment
Read more