His continued detention would amount to violation of his fundamental right under Article 21: SC directs release of Manipur-based political activist detained under NSA

A bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah on Monday directed release of Leichombam Erendro, a Manipur-based political activist, arrested for sedition under the National Security Act by 5 pm, stating that he cannot kept behind bars even for a night as his continued detention would amount to violation of his fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Also Read: The sedition law is a colonial law. Do we still need the law in our country after 75 years of Independence?: Supreme Court

His arrest was a result of his criticism of BJP leaders on use of cow dung and cow urine as cures for Covid-19. The activist, along with journalist Kishorechandra Wangkhem, were arrested for posting the comment over the death of the then Manipur BJP President Saikhom Tikendra Singh.

It was contended by the petitioner (Father of Leichombam Erendro) that the activist had only criticised BJP leaders purportedly advocating cow dung and cow urine as cures for Covid-19 and the preventive detention of the political activist under the NSA, has been done solely to punish him for his criticism of BJP leaders.

“The statement was made in the context of the death of the then Manipur BJP President due to Covid-19, as a criticism of the unscientific position taken and misinformation being spread by several BJP leaders regarding cow urine and cow dung being effective in preventing/treating Covid-19,” the plea said.

CLICK HERE TO READ ORDER.

Comments

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another. Also Read: Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.” The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...

Lawgic Simplified

Search This Blog