Skip to main content

Hearing of India's appeal against Vodafone arbitration award scheduled in September

Hearing of India's appeal against Vodafone arbitration award scheduled in September


By - Nuttida Doungwirote*

Indian Government has filed an appeal against a ruling of an international arbitration tribunal rendered on September 25th, 2020. The ruling states that India has breached “the guarantee of fair and equitable treatment” and therefore is obligated to reimburse Vodafone Group Plc for Rs 22,100 crore (£4,327,294.50)

Background of the dispute

In 2007, Hutchison Telecommunications International Limited, a Hong Kong entity (HTIL) sold its stock in Hutchison Essar Limited, an Indian company (HEL) to Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Netherlands entity (Vodafone)

Under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act 1961, any person paying to a non-resident or a foreign company is obligated to deduct taxes at source. Vodafone, being a payer to a Hong Kong entity, must therefore comply with Section 195 of the Income Tax Act 1961. Vodafone did not comply and was sued by the Indian revenue authorities.

However, the Supreme Court of India held that stocks were excluded from the definition of a capital asset and therefore Section 195 of the Income Tax Act 1961 did not cover the sale of stock in question. Vodafone was not obligated to deduct the taxes at source.


After the judgement, Vodafone started an arbitration process against India under the India-Netherlands BIT. The Tribunal ruled in favor of Vodafone, ordering India to reimburse Rs 22,100 crore (£4,327,294.50) for the legal costs and arbitrator appointment borne by the Claimant. The reason given by the Tribunal is that by demanding retrospective payment, India had breached a fair and equitable treatment guaranteed by the India-Netherlands BIT.

Indian government has challenged this arbitral award before a Singapore Court as the arbitration was seated in Singapore. The hearing is scheduled in September 2021.

*Nuttida Doungwirote is a 4th year student pursuing LL.B. from Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another.  Also Read:  Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

  In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...
Post a Comment
Read more

Justice Rohit Deo of Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench Announces Resignation in Open Court

Justice Rohit Deo, a judge of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, announced his resignation on personal grounds during a courtroom session in Nagpur.  The matters scheduled before him for the day were discharged following the announcement. Appointed to the Bombay High Court in June 2017, he was originally set to retire in December 2025. Justice Deo apologized to those present in the court, stating that he scolded them in an effort to encourage improvement. He expressed his resignation, mentioning that he cannot work against his self-respect. He later confirmed to reporters that he has submitted his resignation letter to the President of India due to personal reasons. Notably, in 2022, Justice Deo had acquitted a former Delhi University professor in a case involving alleged Maoist links. However, the Supreme Court stayed the order and instructed the Nagpur bench to rehear the case. Justice Deo had also recently stayed the implementation of a Maharashtra Government Resolution relate...
Post a Comment
Read more