Application under O.VI R.17 of CPC should be considered on merits before exercising power under O.XII R.6 of CPC: Delhi High Court

Application-under-O.VI-R.17-of-CPC-should-be-considered-on-merits-before-exercising-power-under-O.XII-R.6-of-CPC-Delhi-HC

By - Divisha Srivastava*

The Delhi High Court in a recent verdict has held that a court may accept an application to amend the admission made in pleadings even after reserving judgement on the basis of an application under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”).

The bench of Justice Asha Menon was hearing a plea against an order of the trial court wherein the trial court had listed the matter for further hearing on the amendment application filed by the respondent under Order VI Rule 17, irrespective of the fact that it had reserved its judgment in the matter on the basis of admission under Order XII Rule 6 and Order XV-A of CPC. 

Also Read - Revisional jurisdiction can only be invoked when allowing the application will finally terminate the proceeding: Rajasthan HC.

It was submitted on behalf of the respondent that simply reserving an order on an application under CPC Order XII Rule 6 could not be interpreted as implying that the application would be accepted and the decision would follow.

Drawing a distinction between the phrases, “at any stage of the hearing” and  “at any stage of the proceedings”, the bench observed that, “In Laxman Marotirao Paunikar v. Keshaorao Rambhau Paunikar, 2000 SCC OnLine Bom 169, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) opined that the wording of Order VI Rule 17 of CPC was clear and that amendment could be effected “at any stage of the proceedings” irrespective of the fact that the hearing was complete, as amendment can be sought even at the stage of appeal.” 

Also Read - Live-in-relationship cannot be at the cost of social fabric of this Country: Allahabad High Court.

In the considered opinion of the court, the power under Order XII Rule 6 could result in the final disposal of the case and the defendant would be deprived of his right to defend. Hence, “the application under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC should be considered on merits before the power under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC is exercised by the Trial Courts”.

CLICK HERE TO READ JUDGMENT.


*Divisha Srivastava is a 1st year student pursuing B.B.A.LL.B from S.N.D.T School of Law, Mumbai, Maharashtra.


Comments