PG degree from an Open University in absence of a UG degree doesn't hold value: Madras High Court

By - Divisha Srivastava*

During 2002-04, the petitioner, G Senthil Kumar obtained M.A. Degree from Annamalai University through Open University stream during. He cleared the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission examination and was appointed probation for two years as a Sub-Registrar Grade-II in 2009.

The petitioner had also qualified to be included in the panel for promotion to Sub-Registrar Grade-I post by passing the departmental examination. His name, however, did not appear on the panel, as he had been informed that, according to government orders (GO), anyone who has obtained a post-graduation or any diploma degree from an Open University his application is not valid.

The petitioner approached the Madras High Court against the same and a single-judge bench of the High Court allowed his plea for getting included in the panel for promotion. However on appeal by the department a division bench comprising Justices Pushpa Sathyanarayana and Krishnan Ramasamy overturned the single judge’s decision, stating that while the Tamil Nadu Registration Subordinate Service Rules need merit and competence, seniority alone would not give any rights to the petitioner if he is otherwise unqualified educationally.

“...applying G.O.Ms.No.107 and 116, which state that any Diploma/Degree and Post -Graduate Degree in Open University System other than the regular/main system is not valid and therefore, the petitioner, who has got an M.A., degree without obtaining the Under Graduate from an Open University is not valid...the authorities have rightly rejected the prayer,” the bench held.

CLICK HERE TO READ JUDGMENT.

* Divisha Srivastava is a 1^st year student pursuing B.B.A.LL.B from S.N.D.T School of Law, Mumbai, Maharashtra.

Comments

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another. Also Read: Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.” The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...

Lawgic Simplified

Search This Blog