Skip to main content

Explanation 3C to Section 43B(d) of Income Tax Act is clarificatory and does not purport to add a new condition retrospectively: Supreme Court

Explanation-3C-to-Section-43B(d)-of-Income-Tax-Act-is-clarificatory-and-does-not-purport-to-add-a-new-condition-retrospectively-Supreme-Court

By - Divisha Srivastava*

The Supreme Court recently held that Explanation 3C to Section 43B(d) of the Income Tax Act is “clarificatory” and does not add a new condition with retrospective effect. The bench also noted that a retrospective provision in a tax statute that is for the purpose of removal of doubts, cannot be presumed to be retrospective if it alters or changes the law as it previously stood, even if such language is used.

M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. (Appellant) for the assessment year 1996-1997, submitted a report of income showing a loss of Rs.1,03,18,572/-. The Appellant claimed a deduction of Rs.2,84,71,384/- under Section 43B for debentures issued in lieu of interest accrued and payable to financial institutions in its return. The Assessing Officer dismissed the Appellant's claim in order, holding that the issuance of debentures was not in accordance with the original terms and conditions on which the loans were granted, that interest was due, and that a subsequent change in the terms of the agreement, as they stood at the time, would be contrary to Section 43B(d), rendering the amount ineligible for the deduction.

Also Read - Allahabad High Court dismisses PIL seeking framing of policy for home delivery of liquor

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (“CIT") allowed the appeal, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”) upheld the decision. Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court and the issue to be decided by the High Court was, “whether financing of the interest amount through a term loan amounts to real payment as required by Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961?”

The High Court agreed with the revenue department and set aside the order of ITAT, stating that Explanation 3C, which became effective, would apply to the current case because it relates to AY 1996-97.

Also Read - Application u/s 9 of IBC for initiating CIRP liable to be rejected if a genuine dispute exists: Supreme Court

Explanation 3C, which was included to “remove ambiguities”, simply clarified that interest that had remained unpaid and had been transformed into a loan or borrowing was not regarded to have been paid in full. "This being the case, Explanation 3C is clarificatory – it explains Section 43B(d) as it originally stood and does not purport to add a new condition retrospectively, as has wrongly been held by the High Court", the bench observed.

According to the bench of Justices RF Nariman and BR Gavai, explanation 3C was added to Section 43B to prevent anyone from abusing the rules by not paying interest but instead turning it into a new loan. The bench accordingly set aside the judgment of the High Court and restored the judgment of ITAT.

CLICK HERE TO READ JUDGMENT.

*Divisha Srivastava is a 1st year student pursuing B.B.A.LL.B from S.N.D.T School of Law, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

  In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another.  Also Read:  Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.”   The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...
Post a Comment
Read more