Former Minister Anil Deshmukh Moves SC in Money Laundering Case. Skips ED's Summon For The Third Time Stating Investigation is Not Transparent

Picture Credits: mid-day.com

In a letter to ED’s Mumbai-based assistant director Tassine Sultan, the former minister said: “A series of events has given rise to apprehensions in my mind that neither procedure of law is being followed nor any objective investigations are being carried out.”

Pursuant to issuance of fresh summons by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to Anil Deshmukh, former home minister of Maharashtra, seeking his appearance on July 5, a plea seeking protection from any coercive action in the money laundering case was filed by him in the Supreme Court.

The former home minister has been issued three notices so far by the ED, asking him to appear at their office in south Mumbai Today to record his statement.

ED had issued fresh summons in relation to the bribery-cum-extortion case registered against Deshmukh under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) that resulted in his resignation in April this year.

The former home minister cited his "vulnerability" to COVID-19 as the reason for his non-compliance with the two previous summons. As an alternative he offered the option of video conferencing for recording his statement.

In addition to raids conducted on his premises in Mumbai and Nagpur, the ED carried out raids last month on the premises of the people who aided him.

The ED case against the former minister was initiated after the CBI booked him in a corruption case regarding alleged bribery of at least Rs 100 crore made by former Mumbai Police commissioner Param Bir Singh.

In his last communication sent to the agency, the former minister asserted that his statement had already been recorded by the agency during his "several hours" of interaction with the ED investigators when his premises were raided on June 25.

"I am sanguine to expose the falsity, hollowness and lack of substance in the allegations levelled against me," he had stated.

Comments

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another. Also Read: Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.” The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...

Lawgic Simplified

Search This Blog