We hope and trust that the Union of India will proceed to pass suitable orders and directions regarding use of PVC and chlorinated plastics in banners/hoardings used during elections: Supreme Court

By - Divisha Srivastava*

Concerning the usage of PVC and chlorinated plastics in banners/hoardings used during elections, the Supreme Court has expressed “hope and faith” that the Union of India will take appropriate decisions and pass instructions after finalising objections to the draft notification on the matter.

The bench of Justices L. Nageswara Rao and Aniruddha Bose was hearing an appeal against the NGT's November 2019 ruling on the subject of remedial steps to prohibit the use of PVC and chlorinated plastics in election-related materials such as banners, hoardings, and the like.

Also Read - Bombay High Court directs stay of operation of sub-rules (1) and (3) of Rule 9 of the Information Technology Rules, 2021

NGT had noted that the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (“the Ministry”) has issued directions to the Chief Electoral Officers and to the Chief Secretaries of all States and Union Territories encouraging them to use alternative material in election campaigning such as biodegradable plastics, natural fabrics, recycling paper material, etc.

The NGT then dismissed the application directing that appropriate steps should be taken for compliance of the aforementioned directions and noted that the Ministry and the Chief Election Commission have both stated that the usage of plastic during elections, particularly banners and hoardings, should be avoided.

Also Read - NALSA is requested to consider issuing a uniform country-wide SOP for protecting the rights of convicts to secure pre mature release: Supreme Court

The appellant’s urgent concern, before the bench, was that the Ministry must issue certain directions under Section 5 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986, prohibiting the use of PVC and chlorinated plastics for election campaigning.

The court also took note of ASG Aishwarya Bhati’s statement that a draft notification had been issued seeking objections from all stakeholders in order to ban several kinds of plastic, including PVC, with a thickness of less than 100 microns.

Also Read - The 2010 amendment in the Gratuity Act cannot be treated to be retrospective: Supreme Court

“We hope and trust that the Union of India will proceed to pass suitable orders and directions after finalizing the objections to the draft notification.”, the bench observed.

CLICK HERE TO READ ORDER.

*Divisha Srivastava is a 1st year student pursuing B.B.A.LL.B from S.N.D.T School of Law, Mumbai, Maharashtra.

Comments

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another. Also Read: Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.” The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...

Lawgic Simplified

Search This Blog