SC Issued Notice To Centre, West Bengal and ECI In Plea Seeking SIT Probe Into Post-Poll Violence

Post-Poll Violence: Supreme Court Issues Notice

A PIL seeking a President's Rule in West Bengal was heard by the Supreme Court on Thursday and notices were issued to the Centre, the West Bengal government, and the Election Commission of India (ECI). However notice was not issued to Mamata Banerjee, president of the Trinamool Congress Party (TMC), by the bench comprising of justices Vineet Saran and Dinesh Maheshwari.

The petitioners, Ranjana Agnihotri (Uttar Pradesh based advocate) and Jitender Singh (social worker) also prayed for directions to deploy armed paramilitary forces in order to bring normalcy in the West Bengal and for setting up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the causes and reasons behind post-poll violence in the state.

It was contented in the plea that the PIL has been filed in extraordinary circumstances as numerous residents of the West Bengal are being terrorized, penalised and tortured by the supporters of TMC for supporting Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) during the assembly polls.

Taking into account that the deteriorating state of affairs poses a threat to India's sovereignty and integrity, the petition sought direction from the court to the central government to exercise its powers under Article 355 and Article 356.

Moreover, the plea said that the TMC workers and supporters have been causing chaos and unrest since the announcement of the assembly poll results on May 2, and have set the houses and properties of Hindus on fire, because they had voted for BJP.

“The petitioners are espousing the cause of thousands of citizens of West Bengal who are mostly Hindus and are being targeted by Muslims to take revenge for supporting BJP as they want to crush Hindus so that for years to come the power may remain with the party of their choice,” the PIL read.

Despite the BJP complaining to the ECI against the communal appeal made by the TMC, the ECI failed to conduct the polls in a free and fair manner as mandated under Section 123 of the Representation of Peoples Act .

Since the law and order situation in the state posed a threat to the sovereignty and integrity of India, petitioners sought a directive from the Supreme Court to the Central Government to exercise its powers under Articles 355 and 356 of the Constitution of India.

Comments

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another. Also Read: Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.” The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...

Lawgic Simplified

Search This Blog