If Twitter thinks that it can take as much time as it wants in India, then court will not permit that: Delhi HC in plea seeking compliance of IT Rules 2021 by Twitter

we-are-not-giving-any-protection-to-twitter-centre-is-free-to-take-action-delhi-hc

On Monday, Twitter was accused by the Centre of not complying with the IT rules, 2021. The Centre has stated in its affidavit that Twitter Inc, despite being granted three months' time to comply with the IT Rules, 2021, has failed to adhere to them.

Senior Advocate, Sajjan Poovaya, appearing for Twitter said that the difference in time zones prevented him from contacting company officials in San Francisco. As a result, the court gave Twitter a deadline of Thursday to inform when the grievance officers could be appointed.

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday expressed disappointment over non-compliance of Twitter with the new guidelines on information and technology. "If Twitter thinks that it can take as much time as it wants in our country, then I will not permit that. You should have taken some firm steps to appoint the officer" Justice Rekha Palli said.

Twitter had submitted an affidavit that said it appointed an interim Resident Grievance Officer on May 29, but he resigned on June 21. Twitter's misrepresentation in its affidavit of its appointment of a resident grievance officer mandated under the new IT rules was also condemned by the bench. "You have misled the court and gave a wrong impression. Be that as it may, the least Twitter can do was appoint another officer after June 21. We are concerned with compliance" it said.

According to Hindustan Times, Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma argued that Twitter's refusal to comply with the IT rules undermines India's digital sovereignty. "Forty-two days and no compliance and we have done nothing. Facebook has removed three crore content. Twitter could have done better" Sharma added

The bench also directed Twitter to obtain instructions on the steps being taken for ensuring compliance of the other guidelines of the IT rules saying that everyone should be acquainted with the steps and progress. "Get clear instructions or you will be in trouble" the court said.

Comments

Patna High Court Declares Bihar’s Reservation Amendments Ultra Vires

In a landmark decision, the Patna High Court has invalidated the Bihar government's legislative attempt to increase reservations for backward classes. The court's ruling focused on procedural flaws and the absence of a robust empirical basis for the hike, sparking a debate on judicial intervention in affirmative action policies. Background and Rationale Behind Setting Aside Bihar Reservation Increase Law The Bihar government had proposed an increase in reservations to address socio-economic disparities faced by backward classes. However, the court found that the state failed to follow due process, which includes conducting a thorough empirical study to justify the policy change. This procedural oversight led to the court's decision to strike down the increase. The High Court emphasized the necessity of a data-driven approach for policy changes related to reservations. The ruling underscored that without solid empirical evidence, such policies could not be justified within...

Pune Porsche Crash: Father of Minor Granted Bail

Image Credit: tv9marathi A Pune court has granted bail to the minor’s father, Vishal Agarwal, who faced charges under the Juvenile Justice Act for neglect and endangering the child by allowing him to drive without a license and consume alcohol. Additionally, bar owners and managers were arrested for serving alcohol to minors. The father, already in custody for other related charges, was implicated in the alleged manipulation of his son’s blood samples and in a separate case of kidnapping his driver. Advocate Prashant Patil argued that Vishal Agarwal's arrest was unlawful, contending that the charges were non-cognizable offenses and required a notice under the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Patil also highlighted contradictions in police reports, where the minor was listed as the accused in one FIR and as a victim in another. Also Read: Delhi High Court Stays Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Bail in Excise Policy Case Earlier Proceedings in the Pune Porsche Crash Inc...

Counsel's failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review: Bombay High Court

By - Sameeksha Negi* The Bombay High Court has observed that “If Counsel has not urged a point, the fact that there were written submissions is immaterial if those written submissions were never in fact argued.” The Bench also added that “Counsel’s failure to argue written submissions is not a ground of review or, I dare say, even appeal. It is no ground to assail any order of any judge of any court.” The bench was hearing a review petition filed for seeking reinstatement of original arbitration petition on grounds some of which were never argued and others never pleaded and the said petition was filed after the original arbitration petition was fully argued, and then decided by pronouncement in open court. Also Read - The Pension Scheme for freedom fighters cannot be construed in a manner that the requirements prescribed are rendered a dead letter: Bombay HC According to Justice GS Patel allowing parties to take grounds in review pleas or in appeals that were not argued initi...

Lawgic Simplified

Search This Blog